« Haidl 3 Get 6 Years: The recap | Main | Complete Haidl 3 Verdict Coverage »
"Orange County Superior Court Judge Francisco Briseno handed down [six-year prison sentences] that made sense . . ." Los Angeles Times columnist Dana Parsons, March 12, 2006
Versus
"I [have] argued against prison [for the Haidl 3 gang rapists] . . ." Parsons, Nov. 17, 2004
* * *
Versus
"She was penetrated with a Snapple bottle, a cigarette and a pool cue . . ." Parsons, March 12, 2006 (He failed to mention that the defendants also shoved an apple juice can almost entirely into a lower orifice as well.)
Versus
"The foreign objects amount to kinky dildos." Parsons, Nov. 17, 2004
* * *
Versus
"I hate this case because . . . the victim's promiscuous behavior plays into the overall context." Parsons, Feb. 4, 2005
* * *
Versus
"The apparently unconscious girl . . ." Parsons--even after the guilty verdicts, March 24, 2005
Versus
It was "Jane Doe versus three then-teenage boys who sexually assaulted and videotaped her four years ago while she lay unconscious on a pool table." Parsons--demonstrating that he could finally write the truth but only after nearly four years and courtroom admissions by the guilty parties as they sought leniency, March 12, 2006
* * *
Versus
"The message has to be: To girls who think it's cool or necessary to engage in promiscuous sex, think of Jane Doe." Parsons, March 24, 2005
* * *
Versus
"I hate this case because of its agendas. In some circles, it's become sport. In others, it's politics." Parsons, Feb. 4, 2005
* * *
March 12, 2006 09:03
I'm waiting for the book or Dominick Dunne to do a "Power, Privelege and Justice" episode.
March 12, 2006 12:03
Dana Parsons is a freak who thinks he's a genius. If you've ever spent time around him, you'd know he has no social skills. His ass kissing of the Haidl defense lawyers sets a new low for OC journalism. Hey Dana: way to go man!