Ten More Arguments Against Turning Surf City Water Into Brine

Categories: Environment

PoseidonPic.jpg
Brandon Ferguson
After 10 years of aggressive lobbying, Poseidon Water LLC may soon learn whether or not it can begin building its nearly $1 billion desalination facility in Huntington Beach. A yea vote at the November 13 hearing of the California Coastal Commission will grant Poseidon a coastal development permit--signaling the arrival of earth movers and tractors near the AES power plant on PCH.

In 2003, Weekly Managing Editor Nick Schou,(then a mere staff writer), wrote an article laying out 10 reasons why the plant shouldn't be built. Not much has changed in 10 years--except for the ever-increasing cost of the Poseidon adventure. Here are ten more reasons why this thing should be mothballed:


1. The sticker price keeps rising. In 2004, Poseidon pegged the cost of the plant's construction at $250 million. The company's Carlsbad project, (currently under construction), was financed for more than 3 times that amount. When Schou wrote his piece back in '03, Poseidon estimated the cost of its water at about $800 an acre-foot. Recent company estimates, put that number at $1,424, (assuming the Metropolitan Water District kicks in with a $250 per acre-foot subsidy.)

2. North Orange County is the last place that needs desalination. A vast underground aquifer stretches between Surf City and Fullerton providing the region with 70 percent of its supply. Compared to South County, which imports as much as 90 percent of its water, North OC also benefits from a world famous Groundwater Replenishment System (GWRS). Capable of churning wastewater into 70-million gallons of drinkable H20 per day, the process is both cheaper and three times less energy intensive than desal. The GWRS is currently undergoing a 30-million gallon expansion, and has room to grow.

3. Local districts aren't chomping at the bit to sign on with Poseidon--something the rest of us should pay attention to. For years, 18 OC agencies have engaged in discussions with Poseidon to sign a water purchase agreement. To date, only one agency has signed on the line--the Santa Margarita Water District (SMWD). Interestingly enough, former SMWD Director Roger Faubel is also a paid Poseidon consultant.

4. Poseidon won't create that many jobs. Though the company claims more than 2,000 workers will participate in construction of the plant, Poseidon's own environmental impact report acknowledges the facility will be staffed with a slim workforce of 25 employees.

5. Poseidon will be attached to HB's AES power plant, which uses antiquated technology known as once-through cooling, to draw in millions of gallons of water (as well as fish eggs and other marine life). Deemed environmentally harmful by the state in 2010, once- through cooling is being phased out across California. But Poseidon hopes to continue using the technology anyway. If the company is required by law to invest in environmentally-friendly subterranean intake pipes, the company could potentially pass the added expense on to ratepayers.


My Voice Nation Help
7 comments
vegandawg23
vegandawg23 topcommenter

In 20-30 years when this place is Mexico and we're facing a severe water shortage remember the idiocy of the libs here. You can't even eat the offshore fish. If it wasn't cost effective to desalinate the water, a private company wouldn't bother. Having infrastructure in place before we need water is pretty important. Redundancy is a good thing when it comes to biological necessities such as food and water. Fish eggs, jesus christ you people make me sick. 

FishWithoutBicycle
FishWithoutBicycle

The Poseidon Plant was a terrible idea...still IS a terrible idea. But Poseidon Water LLC is only interested in lining its pockets while the rest of us "peasants" (and that "pesky" environment) pay the price.

brandonf76
brandonf76

@vegandawg23 Hey, you're the one fixating on fish eggs instead of the nine other arguments in this blog. As for desalination being cost effective, let me direct your attention back to argument #1. Even with a public subsidy of $250 an acre-foot, Poseidon water is more expensive than anything we're getting now. Desalination is inherently cost ineffective.

vegandawg23
vegandawg23 topcommenter

@brandonf76 Redundency brandonf76. We need redundency in our water supply. You're some NIMBY coastal condo owner or something. Well guess what, you're not fooling anyone with your nonsense environmental lies. What do you care what the cost is? You think a few bucks more for water is gonna matter? Nope, you don't want to ruin your ocean view and are looking for suckers to go out and make a fuss for you about a buncha nonsense. Well sorry, our access to clean drinking water in a DESERT is more important than you seeing an ocean sunset.

vegandawg23
vegandawg23 topcommenter

@brandonf76 @vegandawg23 Sorry, I was incorrect. After clicking on your profile, i realize you're just a professional busybody. Carry on then.

Now Trending

Anaheim Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Fashion

General

Loading...