Anaheim Council Majority's Special Early-Bird Meeting Flips The Bird to Mayor Tom Tait

Thumbnail image for TomTait.jpg
Mayor Tait
In a special morning meeting of the Anaheim city council, Mayor Tom Tait's authority to put items on the agenda in between sessions was stripped from his office. Despite the early 8 a.m. start time, the council chambers were well-attended and public comments on the sole issue at hand lasted for an hour, all critical.

"What are you so afraid of?" questioned resident Cynthia Ward of councilman Jordan Brandman, who she claimed railed in her home when he wasn't on the dais against an attempted call of a special meeting by Tait last year regarding the original $158 million GardenWalk Hotel project subsidy that failed to meet quorum.

Others said that the impending vote was tantamount to censoring the Mayor. Their considerations seemed to be all for not as the meeting played out as a predictable display of entrenched power.

"I brought this as a technical clean up," Brandman said to Tait once debate turned between council members. "This is about transparency. I don't think this is a retaliation against you." All other four members played up the supposed technicality issue of the Mayor's authority to unilaterally agendize items for future council meetings between them and during them. Since Tait has been an island onto himself on contentious issues dating back to last year, requiring that such actions be seconded would have potentially put him a politically compromised position.

Councilwoman Lucille Kring took things out of the abstract saying, "The Mayor wanted to put the Angels deal on every single council meeting moving forward." The memorandum of understanding has been a contentious one since approved, particularly the leasing of 155 acres of city-owned property surrounding the stadium for a dollar a year over sixty-six years to Angels owner Arte Moreno's umbrella company. Assuming the worst, Mayor Tait agendized discussions every third meeting at the onset anticipating he would no longer be able to do so by morning's end.

Interestingly, a minimal salve was put on the Kabuki theater that played out this morning. Brandman's resolution was amended by Kring's suggestion to state that any council member can put an item on the agenda for discussion unilaterally during council communications. "It came within a whisker of me not even having that," Tait tells the Weekly. "It surprised me."

A testy exchange between Tait and Murray ensued as she claimed that the eviscerated practice of the Mayor placing agenda items by way of calling the city manager was private, behind closed doors, and not public. Should any issues of urgency arise, Murray suggested the calling of special meetings as the remedy. Tait characterized her transparency arguments as Orwellian.

Thumbnail image for lgalloway.jpg
It was all a bit reminiscent of former councilwoman Lorri Galloway being stripped of her 'Mayor Pro Tem' title last year. The rationale back then was that she supposedly misused it when promoting a 'Let the People Vote Charter Amendment' for hotel subsidies. Murray claimed that the action, supported by her cohorts, was "not personal." This time around, Mayor Tait was stripped of much more than a symbolic title.

"I think it was a mean-spirited act," said Tait to close out the special meeting. "The people of Anaheim and democracy are hurt by this action."

Follow Gabriel San Román on Twitter @dpalabraz

Follow OC Weekly on Twitter@ocweekly or on Facebook!

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help

Not sure if you got to see this, they outed the faux outrage of Fitzgerald's comments as being the work of Curt Pringle's staff, while Curt Pringle allowed horrid things to be said when he was Mayor. WHY is Curt's staff so busy giving a black eye to the guy who followed him into office? Could it be,,,,NO...could it be that perhaps Curt Pringle is the lobbyist for Arte Moreno?! 

Councilwoman Lucille Kring took things out of the abstract saying, "The Mayor wanted to put the Angels deal on every single council meeting moving forward." 

So here is a thought.  It is frighteningly clear the Council majority is working together to suppress discussion and discovery of relevant information. The Mayor has been silenced in terms of getting items on the agenda, and now attacked for bogus charges about something he did not cause and had no control over. Now I am no lawyer, but in the event there is wrong doing of any kind related to the Angels deal (and it is hard to look at the deal points and imagine something does NOT smell to high heaven behind the scenes) is it possible that law enforcement looking into this deal might see those coordinated efforts to silence the Mayor as some sort of collusion or cover-up? IF (not saying it is happening just throwing out a theory) IF there is something stinky in the Angels deal, how far does coordination have to go before the phrase "racketeering charges" starts getting thrown around? This simply does NOT look good for the Council, they are working way too hard to stop discussion of something they claim is good for Anaheim. 


Mayor Tait has been railroaded in a very vindictive manner by fellow council members!


I'm thinking of a 'technical cleanup' that would do the Council some good. First, you get 4 brooms.....

Now Trending

Anaheim Concert Tickets

From the Vault