Attorney Unveils Suit Alleging Cover-up of Disgusting Child Abuse by DA, County Agency

Categories: Court

brian-claypool-126x74.jpg
Brian Claypool
A lead attorney in the Miramonte Elementary School child abuse case that broke in Los Angeles last year has turned his attention to the Orange County Social Services Agency. Brian Claypool accuses the agency's Child Protective Services (CPS) workers of "aiding and abetting the commission of child abuse and child endangerment."

He is scheduled to hold a press conference in the Orange County Social Services Agency Building this morning to demand a state Attorney General and U.S. Department of Justice audit and criminal investigation of CPS, as well as announce his federal civil rights lawsuit against the agency.

Claypool is to be joined by his client Ruby Dillon, the mother of a 7-year-old girl who was, the attorney claims, "legally kidnapped" by CPS "despite no reliable evidence to support removal of the little girl from her mom and repeated credible reports by the child and qualified medical experts of alleged sexual abuse by the father."

Getting the Social Services Agency's response to this will be difficult because officials cannot discuss specific clients. Claypool is under no such restrictions. In a very long email previewing today's 11:30 a.m. press conference, he says that:

  • CPS willfully tracked and abducted the girl by "fabricating evidence," obstructing justice, committing perjury and routinely violating the law;

  • CPS workers violated the 4th and 14th amendments to the Constitution, the grounds for his lawsuit;

  • California's Attorney General and the U.S. Department of Justice must "immediately undertake criminal investigations of the Orange County CPS to uncover a decade long custom and practice by the CPS of "child trafficking" for financial gain and criminal obstruction of justice, failing to report child abuse to law enforcement and aiding and abetting the commission of child abuse and child endangerment;

  • Orange County's CPS must undergo a comprehensive audit;

  • Orange County's district attorney must explain to the community why "crucial" search warrants were not issued "immediately after the little girl made credible reports of alleged sexual abuse by the father (including videotaping and photographs) and why criminal charges have not yet been levied against the father for the alleged sexual abuse and members of the CPS for aiding and abetting the abuse."

Claypool called Orange County CPS a "protected empire" that is motivated by $2.2 billion in state and federal funding based in part on the number of children adopted out of foster care. The attorney claims children are removed from homes they are living in lawfully to keep funding flowing.

He goes on to graphically detail repeated cases of alleged rape and molestation of the girl by her father, the CPS of botching its investigation of the abuse and the DA's office of covering this all up.

"It should be noted that the father of the minor is represented by a prominent lawyer Al Stokke, who is an ardent supporter of the Orange County district attorney," Claypool notes. "At no time did CPS ever intervene on behalf of the minor to inform the court (as is their fiduciary duty) about this pattern of suspected sexual abuse by the minor's father."

The attorney says the Tustin Police Department did remove the child from the father's home twice out of safety concerns after finding her stories credible but that she was not placed with her mother, who has no record of abuse. Instead, thanks to repeated intervention by CPS, the girl was returned to her father's "house of horrors," Claypool says.

Through his Claypool Law Firm, the attorney is also representing 15 children and 22 parents from LA's Miramonte case.

Email: mcoker@ocweekly.com. Twitter: @MatthewTCoker. Follow OC Weekly on Twitter @ocweekly or on Facebook!


My Voice Nation Help
21 comments
anonymous
anonymous

Re: Ruby Rupindar Kaur Dhillon Dillon


Why is a pastor who prays for a death of the President of the  USA be involved in this case with Ruby Dillon? Pastors are suppose to lead the flocks and not pray for the death of a President of a country! 

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUHS5u8v1Ck


Clearly, this person Ruby is a shady character herself and her professional contacts are the same. 

Ruby as an illegal person, supports and is supported by a Pastor who prays for a death of a leader of a country that Ruby is living in. She is not obligated to live in the USA. She has no ties, why is she living in the USA?  She was born in the UK, and her parents came from India. 

Ruby only wants to get a green card by fraud. Ruby only wants to earn USA cash money and not pay the taxes. If Ruby does not play to the role of a victim, then, she is deported and banned for life to re-enter the USA.

Sick
Sick

Ruby Dillon is a sick criminal. She has been practicing dentistry on our friends and family members in Orange County since 2002 without a license. She is also illegal. She has done harm to many patients and that is why she lost her license.

Our system is so sick that they would favor an international terrorist like her than to protect us Americans.

And, all of you guys are committing treason by supporting a terrorist.

Sick
Sick

Ruby Dillon is a sick criminal. She has been practicing dentistry on our friends and family members in Orange County since 2002 without a license. She is also illegal. She has done harm to many patients and that is why she lost her license.

Our system is so sick that they would favor an international terrorist like her than to protect us Americans.

And, all of you guys are committing treason by supporting a terrorist.

TrueInformation
TrueInformation

Ruby's Credibility: None



Case Number: 11V001064 (Available from the Orange County Superior, it is not a Confidential Case).


Filed on: May 31, 2011


Filed by: Joseph Allan Gleisinger,  under sworn testimony  against his wife Rupindar Kaur Dhillon, UK Born, claims to have a Canadian Passport, Living and working in the USA illegally. Ruby had made Rape accusations against him. Arrested, Jailed, yet Ruby Refused to follow thru as a witness.


Ruby Rupindar Kaur Dhillon’s 3 Dates of Birth registered in court:  5/19/1965, 5/17/1966 (one some court’s document it is 5/17/1971).


Mr. Gleisinger’s Sworn Statements:


1.“May 26, 2011...Man threw paper work in my face…screaming at me…If I would get involved in Ruby’s life that he would kill me.”

2.“…Threatened bodily harm stating that If he saw me out he would beat the shit out of me..

3.“I have received countless text messages over the past several weeks from Ruby many in violation of the initial 10 day restraining order telling me that I should not reach out to the father….”

4.“I am finding that separating myself from her dysfunctional life is proving to be more difficult and costly than I would like.”

5.“I have on multiple occasions requested her to file for an annulment so she can stop adversely impacting my existence and so that she can live her life according to her unethical standards”

6.“In addition to calling Ruby’s lawyer I filed a report with the Newport Beach Police Department and personally outline the events with Officer Spencer.”

7.“I am formally requesting that the court subpoena ruby to disclose the names and contact information for the individual who threatened my life so that I can initiate a restraining order for my personal protection. “

8.“The Gatehouse Supervisor recognized Ruby’s car, is a patient of Ruby’s and personally acknowledged and spoke to her as they entered my apartment complex.”

9.“Ruby has been visiting my apartment for the past five years and the same attendant has been on guard for many years.”

10.“Ruby has mentioned to me numerous times that she would have me killed..”

11.“A few months ago I filed the paperwork to get a restraining order against Ms. Dhillon when the I learned from her that she had me discussed having me killed by Lucia Ferraro’s fiancé’.

12.“Ruby hired Lucia Ferraro as her Medical Director for her Med spa and Lucia’s boyfriend is from side of the tracks.”

13.“For years Ruby has been rewarded for her unethical behavior. “

14.“She stole and returned my wedding ring two weeks after our marriage and invited all of the women on my facebook page to a trip to Las Vegas..”

15.“She has been illegally working in this country for the past 7 years..”

16.“She has not paid any income tax for the past five years despite earning in excess of 300K each of those years.”

17.“Ruby has been taking thyroid medications, testosterone cream (provided illegally by her adulterous lover Ammed who resides in her condos complex), DHEA, progesterone,  Ambien,  Xanax, HCG, Phentaramine, ecstasy and growth hormone.”

18.“Those drugs in addition to her alcohol dependence adversely affect her mood which makes her a very dangerous person and often causes outbreaks of extreme volatility.”

19.‘I have voice mails to support her…Violent tendencies.”

20.“Since the Domestic violence incident Ruby has been avidly calling family, friends and prospective employers letting them know that It would be a good idea to hire or befriend a convicted felon.”

21.“To clarify, I have not been convicted of anything ONLY ACCUSED.”

22.“If there was anyone that lacks credibility and has motive it’s Ms. Dhillon.”

23.“She is an illegal immigrant, tax evader, alcoholic, drug addict, adulterer and habitual liar and sneak.”

24.“All of these unethical behaviors in addition to her being disciplined by the California Dental Board for fraud based investigations are evidence of her poor behavior and wild accusations. “

25.“Ruby has threatened on multiple occasions to fabricate another story to have me thrown in jail again. “

26.“..Extremely disturbed women with massive personal and professional problems.”

27.“Going forward, I can no longer be supportive of her and commit any more of my life to her cause based upon her completive nature and desire to destroy.”

28.“The five years I have known Ms. Dhillon have been devastating.”

29.“I have consulted with a family attorney to initiate a legal separation based upon Ruby’s inability to……her extra marital affairs.”

30.“..I was aware of her constant need of attention from other men.”

31.“Ruby did not display any of the tendencies a typical marriage would be based upon and as such she agreed that if she did not change she would be responsible for any costs associated with its termination.”

32.“I implore the court to subpoena Ruby to disclose the contact information of the man who accompanied into my complex on May 26th and threatened my life.”

33.“..This is the individual that she plotted with and this individual is a former Tustin Police Officer name Tom”.

34.“…Ruby should be detained until the information is disclosed.”

TrueInfomation
TrueInfomation

Ruby Dillon aka Rupindar Dhillon, Date of birth 5/17/1966

Booked for child abduction and trafficking of the minor. 



Results for booking number: 2825184 REAL ORANGE COUNTY BOOKING NUMBER


Inmate Name:DHILLON , RUPINDAR KAURDate of Birth:05-17-1966Next Appearance Date: Sex:Female Next Appearance Court: Race:Other Custody Status:Released Height:5' 05" Bail Amount:$0.00 Weight:130 Arrested on:05-07-2014 Hair Color:Black Housing Location:Intake Release Center (Women) Eye Color:  BrownRelease Type: Bond Posted Occupation:UNEMPLOYED Release Date: 05-08-2014 05:40:00 

ssss
ssss

 Ruby Dillon was arrested in Orange County today for child trafficking and illegal VDO taping of minors. This is a poster child for the organization American Demand CPS reform and anti-CPS organizations. 

ssss
ssss

The Criminal Ruby Dillon aka Rupindar Dhillon was just arrested in Orange County today in hand cuff. 

Salim
Salim

Criminal Ruby Dhillon aka Rupinder Dhillon, she is telling people that she cannot work because is distracted. The real truth is this. This is an undocumented thug hiding in the Orange County. She does not want to go back to her home town,  Abbotsford, BC, Canada. She like ripping Americans for the money. Suspended dental license. She is still pretending to be a working doctor.  Can three judges with over one hundred days at court be wrong? You make the call!  She accused her husband of raping her. Then, she refused the "rape kit'  offered by Irvine PD. Then, during the deposition she claims that he did not rape her. Then, she told the appointed therapist that he did rape her. Then, during the trial the minor's counsel asked her if she was raped, she said yes. And, now she has endorsed her husband, Mr. Allan Gleisinger, whom she accused of raping her, to be the guardian of her child. Furthermore, she has offered to the police during her traffic violation one DOB, then, on the court records she has offered her DOB to be 5/17/71, yet,on another affidavit to the court she put in another date. Three date of birth. So,between her rape incident and birth dates, this is a character you are dealing with. Lies, Lies, Lies, Lies, Lies, Lies, Lies, Lies. No one is perfect, but, in this case I would trust CPS and the Judges who deem Ruby to be a professional child abuser. In a lot of states and countries that is a crime. Big, crime. Kidnapping, VDO taping of the child, now the cameraman is coming out of the closet in a tell all story. 

Tony
Tony

How about Brian Claypool covering up for child abuse committed by Ruby to her daughter. This is what attorneys do for fame under the sun. 

Stephen
Stephen

Why do you think CPS is a scam? Do you think the attorneys who make $ 500/hour are saintly. The clients they represent are no more "monster' than the CPS workers. Mr. Claypool is representing an illegal Indian from Canada. Ruby Dhillon. She is a convicted child abuser. Of course she is going to hire an attorney and tell  the whole world is bad. So, she can get child support and get a USA green card not be deported. She was working as dentist with a suspended license for the longest time. Of course she is going to do her best to save face. Most immigrants in other countries do not have any rights. But, this one, is abusing Americans, and the American system is standing by her.

carrolestewart
carrolestewart

These cases unfortunately are way too common.  CPS needs a major overhaul.  The dont protect kids that need protecting and then steal others like baby sammy.  All the cps workers care about is meeting their quotas so they can keep getting the money.  Read angelas comments for details

Lawabidingcitizen
Lawabidingcitizen

Thanks for sharing Angela! That certainly makes things clearer.  CPS profits from separating families and breaking up homes. This corrupt industry needs to be dismantled from the top down.  They have been allowed to reign in secret for too long.

angela.pierce76
angela.pierce76


CPS and affiliates rewarded for breaking up families Child "protection" is one of the biggest businesses in the country. We spend $12 billion a year on it. The money goes to tens of thousands of a) state employees, b) collateral professionals, such as lawyers, court personnel, court investigators, evaluators and guardians, judges, and c) DSS contracted vendors such as counselors, therapists, more "evaluators", junk psychologists, residential facilities, foster parents, adoptive parents, MSPCC, Big Brothers/Big Sisters, YMCA, etc. This newspaper is not big enough to list all of the people in this state who have a job, draw a paycheck, or make their profits off the kids in DSS custody. In this article I explain the financial infrastructure that provides the motivation for DSS to take people’s children – and not give them back. In 1974 Walter Mondale promoted the Child Abuse and Prevention Act which began feeding massive amounts of federal funding to states to set up programs to combat child abuse and neglect. From that came Child "Protective" Services, as we know it today. After the bill passed, Mondale himself expressed concerns that it could be misused. He worried that it could lead states to create a "business" in dealing with children. Then in 1997 President Clinton passed the "Adoption and Safe Families Act." The public relations campaign promoted it as a way to help abused and neglected children who languished in foster care for years, often being shuffled among dozens of foster homes, never having a real home and family. In a press release from the U.S. Department of Health & Human Services dated November 24, 1999, it refers to "President Clinton’s initiative to double by 2002 the number of children in foster care who are adopted or otherwise permanently placed." It all sounded so heartwarming. We, the American public, are so easily led. We love to buy stereotypes; we just eat them up, no questions asked. But, my mother, bless her heart, taught me from the time I was young to "consider the source." In the stereotype that we’ve been sold about kids in foster care, we picture a forlorn, hollow-eyed child, thin and pale, looking up at us beseechingly through a dirt streaked face. 

angela.pierce76
angela.pierce76

 Unconsciously, we pull up old pictures from Life magazine of children in Appalachia in the 1930s. We think of orphans and children abandoned by parents who look like Manson family members. We play a nostalgic movie in our heads of the little fellow shyly walking across an emerald green, manicured lawn to meet Ward and June Cleaver, his new adoptive parents, who lead him into their lovely suburban home. We imagine the little tyke’s eyes growing as big as saucers as the Cleavers show him his very own room, full of toys and sports gear. And we just feel so gosh darn good about ourselves. Now it’s time to wake up to the reality of the adoption business. Very few children who are being used to supply the adoption market are hollow-eyed tykes from Appalachia. Very few are crack babies from the projects. [Oh… you thought those were the children they were saving? Think again]. When you are marketing a product you have to provide a desirable product that sells. In the adoption business that would be nice kids with reasonably good genetics who clean up good. An interesting point is that the Cape Cod & Islands office leads the state in terms of processing kids into the system and having them adopted out. More than the inner city areas, the projects, Mission Hill, Brockton, Lynn, etc. Interesting… With the implementation of the Adoption and Safe Families Act, President Clinton tried to make himself look like a humanitarian who is responsible for saving the abused and neglected children. The drive of this initiative is to offer cash "bonuses" to states for every child they have adopted out of foster care, with the goal of doubling their adoptions by 2002, and sustaining that for each subsequent year. They actually call them "adoption incentive bonuses," to promote the adoption of children. Of course, the other reason behind the cash bonuses was to target families in preparation for Eugenics and Socialized Medicine. Where to Find the Children A whole new industry was put into motion. A sweet marketing scheme that even Bill Gates could envy. Now, if you have a basket of apples, and people start giving you $100 per apple, what are you going to do? Make sure that you have an unlimited supply of apples, right? The United States Department of Health & Human Services administers Child Protective Services. To accompany the ASF Act, the President requested, by executive memorandum, an initiative entitled Adoption 2002, to be implemented and managed by Health & Human Services. The initiative not only gives the cash adoption bonuses to the states, it also provides cash adoption subsidies to adoptive parents until the children turn eighteen. Everybody makes money. If anyone really believes that these people are doing this out of the goodness of their hearts, then I’ve got some bad news for you. The fact that this program is run by HHS, ordered from the very top, explains why the citizens who are victims of DSS get no response from their legislators. It explains why no one in the Administration cares about the abuse and fatalities of children in the "care" of DSS, and no one wants to hear about the broken arms, verbal abuse, or rapes. They are just business casualties. It explains why the legislators I’ve talked to for the past three years look at me with pity. Because I’m preaching to the already damned. The legislators have forgotten who funds their paychecks and who they need to account to, as has the Governor. Because it isn’t the President. It’s us. How DSS Is Helped The way that the adoption bonuses work is that each state is given a baseline number of expected adoptions based on population. For every child that DSS can get adopted, there is a bonus of $4,000 to $6,000. THIS NUMBER RECENTLY DOUBLED WITH ASFA But that is just the starting figure in a complex mathematical formula in which each bonus is multiplied by the percentage that the state has managed to exceed its baseline adoption number. The states must maintain this increase in each successive year. [Like compound interest.] The bill reads: "$4,000 to $6,000 will be multiplied by the amount (if any) by which the number of foster child adoptions in the State exceeds the base number of foster child adoptions for the State for the fiscal year." In the "technical assistance" section of the bill it states that, "the Secretary [of HHS] may, directly or through grants or contracts, provide technical assistance to assist states and local communities to reach their targets for increased numbers of adoptions for children in foster care." The technical assistance is to support "the goal of encouraging more adoptions out of the foster care system; the development of best practice guidelines for expediting the termination of parental rights; the development of special units and expertise in moving children toward adoption as a permanent goal; models to encourage the fast tracking of children who have not attained 1 year of age into pre-adoptive placements; and the development of programs that place children into pre-adoptive placements without waiting for termination of parental rights." In the November press release from HHS it continues, " HHS awarded the first ever adoption bonuses to States for increases in the adoption of children from the public foster care system." Some of the other incentives offered are "innovative grants" to reduce barriers to adoption [i.e., parents], more State support for adoptive families, making adoption affordable for families by providing cash subsides and tax credits. A report from a private think tank, the National Center for Policy Analysis, reads: "The way the federal government reimburses States rewards a growth in the size of the program instead of the effective care of children." Another incentive being promoted is the use of the Internet to make adoption easier. Clinton directed HHS to develop an Internet site to "link children in foster care with adoptive families." So we will be able to window shop for children on a government web site. If you don’t find anything you like there, you can surf on over to the "Adopt Shoppe." If you prefer to actually be able to kick tires instead of just looking at pictures you could attend one of DSS’s quaint "Adoption Fairs," where live children are put on display and you can walk around and browse. Like a flea market to sell kids. If one of them begs you to take him home you can always say, "Sorry. Just looking." The incentives for government child snatching are so good that I’m surprised we don’t have government agents breaking down people’s doors and just shooting the parents in the heads and grabbing the kids. But then, if you need more apples you don’t chop down your apple trees. Benefits for Foster Parents That covers the goodies the State gets.

angela.pierce76
angela.pierce76

Now let’s have a look at how the Cleavers make out financially after the adoption is finalized. After the adoption is finalized, the State and federal subsidies continue. The adoptive parents may collect cash subsidies until the child is 18. If the child stays in school, subsidies continue to the age of 22. There are State funded subsidies as well as federal funds through the Title IV-E section of the Social Security Act. The daily rate for State funds is the same as the foster care payments, which range from $410-$486 per month per child. Unless the child can be designated "special needs," which of course, they all can. According to the NAATRIN State Subsidy profile from DSS, "special needs" may be defined as: "Physical disability, mental disability, emotional disturbance; a significant emotional tie with the foster parents where the child has resided with the foster parents for one or more years and separation would adversely affect the child’s development if not adopted by them." [But their significant emotional ties with their parents, since birth, never enter the equation. Additional "special needs" designations are: a child twelve years of age or older; racial or ethnic factors; child having siblings or half-siblings. In their report on the State of the Children, Boston’s Institute for Children says: "In part because the States can garner extra federal funds for special needs children the designation has been broadened so far as to become meaningless." "Special needs" children may also get an additional Social Security check. The adoptive parents also receive Medicaid for the child, a clothing allowance and reimbursement for adoption costs such as adoption fees, court and attorney fees, cost of adoption home study, and "reasonable costs of food and lodging for the child and adoptive parents when necessary to complete the adoption process." Under Title XX of the Social Security Act adoptive parents are also entitled to post adoption services "that may be helpful in keeping the family intact," including "daycare, specialized daycare, respite care, in-house support services such as housekeeping, and personal care, counseling, and other child welfare services". Wow! Everything short of being knighted by the Queen!] The subsidy profile actually states that it does not include money to remodel the home to accommodate the child. But, as subsidies can be negotiated, remodeling could possibly be accomplished under the "innovative incentives to remove barriers to adoption" section. The subsidy regulations read that "adoption assistance is based solely on the needs of the child without regard to the income of the family." What an interesting government policy when compared to the welfare program that the same child’s mother may have been on before losing her children, and in which she may not own anything, must prove that she has no money in the bank; no boats, real estate, stocks or bonds; and cannot even own a car that is safe to drive worth over $1000. This is all so she can collect $539 per month for herself and two children. The foster parent who gets her children gets $820 plus. We spit on the mother on welfare as a parasite who is bleeding the taxpayers, yet we hold the foster and adoptive parents [who are bleeding ten times as much from the taxpayers] up as saints. The adoptive and foster parents aren’t subjected to psychological evaluations, ink blot tests, MMPI’s, drug & alcohol evaluations, or urine screens as the parents are. Adoption subsidies may be negotiated on a case by case basis. Anyone ever tried to "negotiate" with the Welfare Department? There are many e-mail lists and books published to teach adoptive parents how to negotiate to maximize their subsidies. As one pro writes on an e-mail list: "We receive a subsidy for our kids of $1,900 per month plus another $500 from the State of Florida. We are trying to adopt three more teens and we will get subsidies for them, too. It sure helps out with the bills." I can’t help but wonder why we don’t give this same level of support to the children’s parents in the first place? According to Cornell University, about 68% of all child protective cases "do not involve child maltreatment." The largest percentage of CPS/DSS cases are for "deprivation of necessities" due to poverty. So, if the natural parents were given the incredible incentives and services listed above that are provided to the adoptive parents, wouldn’t it stand to reason that the causes for removing children in the first place would be eliminated? How many less children would enter foster care in the first place? The child protective budget would be reduced from $12 billion to around $4 billion. Granted, tens of thousands of social workers, administrators, lawyers, juvenile court personnel, therapists, and foster parents would be out of business, but we would have safe, healthy, intact families, which are the foundation of any society. That’s just a fantasy, of course. The reality is that maybe we will see Kathleen Crowley’s children on the government home-shopping-for-children web site and some one out there can buy them. May is national adoption month. To support "Adoption 2002," the U.S. Postal Service is issuing special adoption stamps. Let us hope they don’t feature pictures of kids who are for sale. I urge everyone to boycott these stamps and register complaints with the post office. I know that I’m feeling pretty smug and superior about being part of such a socially advanced and compassionate society. How about you?

Thank you for subscribing to: CPS CORRUPTION by Kathleen Dearinger Visit my other websites at: www.fu4crf.blogspot.com www.youtube.com/osoluckyme www.myspace.com/osoluckyme

anticpsworrier

www.fu4crf.blogspot.com

amidimatst
amidimatst

From my experience, most of sexual abuse allegations in this kind of situation is one parent's attempt to hurt the other one in a custody battle. I am not familiar with this particular case, but if that is what this mother did, maybe she deserved to have child removed from her. If there were strong evidence against the father, he would be arrested already.

18usc241
18usc241 topcommenter

Whenever investigating ANYTHING, once you've discovered the significant financial motives - STOP. You're done. 

jusbecuz
jusbecuz

Finally!! The mention of confidentiality that CPS uses to hide behind their comments is brought to light in that PARENTS can waive that and discuss their case with attorneys or anyone whom they choose. I say, don't bother to question CPS to get nothing for an answer. Expose the agency without their side of the story!

paullucas714
paullucas714 topcommenter

CPS has a horrible record of misconduct and outright abuse. They have a financial incentive to remove kids for homes which leads to a sort of bounty system and quota system. I hope they do get audited and severely audited. The case of a Sacramento family who had their child removed because they wanted a second opinion on a medical issues shows that the whole framework of how CPS is conducted needs to be audited and thoroughly.

angela.pierce76
angela.pierce76

@Lawabidingcitizen this has been going on far too long! please help bring awareness to this by sharing with everyone that you know....its time that changes be made. god bless!


qqqqq
qqqqq

@amidimatst  

Mother is hand cuffed and arrested today. The Child is removed from the mother with no contact. 

Now Trending

Anaheim Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Fashion

General

Loading...