Tasha Tells All...On America's Acceptance of Hollywood Violence but Hatred of Hollywood Sex!

Thumbnail image for tasha_reign.jpg
Every Monday, adult superstar/OC girl Tasha Reign gives us her thoughts on life, sex, politics and everything in between. Today, Tasha weighs in on America's acceptance of Hollywood violence and hatred of Hollywood sex. Enjoy!

Last weekend, my date took me to Pain and Gain, a film based on a true-crime series that originally appeared in OC Weekly's sister paper, Miami New Times. Going to the movies is one of my favorite hobbies, and I'll watch anything, from action to comedy and even girly chick flicks.


What a unique and disturbing movie! Pain and Gain was pretty fabulous--at least the parts I was able to see, given I had my eyes closed through most of the film, especially during the brutal and gratuitous murders reenacted by Mark Wahlberg's character, Daniel Lugo. The movie (centered around bodybuilder friends who went on to murder, kidnap, extort, and torture) was simultaneously funny, sad, disgusting, violent, entertaining and brutal--a film that definitely deserves its R rating.

In between the chuckles and the violence, I began thinking of the hypocrisy America has toward filmic depictions of violence and sex. We love, love, love cinematic violence--everyone seems to be thoroughly entertained by it. We don't bat an eye when taking kids to The Hunger Games, a film where the plot centers around children killing one another in a gruesome manner. We tolerate the destruction and mayhem in the Marvel films and other action movies. But God forbid people over the age of 18 see too many breasts in a Hollywood production, let alone an erect penis--let alone any type of penetration whatsoever.

I took a film and cinema course last year at UCLA and learned a great deal about what censors allow in mainstream movies, what such censoring does to a film's rating, and how said rating affects the production's revenue. No film will ever receive an R rating if there is actual video footage of intercourse for even a second. But you can sneak in the on-screen killing of someone in a PG-13 film--heck, construct a whole narrative around multiple killings of teenagers. Which do you think is more ruinous to society?

I'm not criticizing fans of violent cinema, or filmmakers who love to focus on gore, blood and fictional suffering--if you like that stuff, go for it. What I am questioning, however, is the wide acceptance of cinematic violence by a society that at the same time completely and utterly condemns sexuality on film.

When I was growing up, my mother never allowed for me to watch violent imagery of any kind. I might've protested as a kid, but I'm glad she did it, because that meant I never became numb to bloodshed. When I'm at the movies with my friends, I'm the one jumping around and screaming whenever there's something violent. My friends? Entertained, interested, and indulged in the spectacle, but numb, unchanged, and passive to the blood.

Now, I know what a lot of you are thinking--watching too much sex on film is like watching too much violence, and the numbing effects are just as dangerous. I get you. But what exactly is wrong with viewing nudity and sex, and getting familiar with and enamored by a natural human function? Consensual sex is a beautiful thing, and films that provoke passion and curiosity are even better. You gain nothing with violence; you gain so much more with learning about what makes you aroused. Parents should definitely guard against their children watching on-screen sex, but why are they so vigilant about that yet so much more accepting of cinematic violence?

So tell me, readers: what is it about cinematic sex that brings down society's condemnation so quickly, a society that'll then turn around at yawn at the casual murders and fights that are de rigeur nowadays in Hollywood (and forever, if you know your Westerns)? Is it the possibility of homosexuality that is alarming? Is it the roughness and wildness? Is it the screaming orgasms or possibility of not being monogamous? Or is it the monster-sized body parts? Or is the sex without hopes of procreation? Between sex and violence, one subject sure seems less harmful than the other. I will let you decide which one I think is which :)

Follow Tasha Reign on Twitter: @tashareign

Follow OC Weekly on Twitter @ocweekly or on Facebook!



Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help
11 comments
wise1
wise1

Because homophobic transphobic rapist men are very violent and sexually repressed.

fruitcake
fruitcake

Oh Tasha, Tasha , Tasha. Let me start by saying, its so L.A. to take a film class.Did you stop by chateau marmont for lunch afterward?Why don't you get real with us Tasha?Give us the stats what sex before marriage is doing to society.Please tell our young people the average age of a pornstar is only 38 years old compared to 78 years old of those not in the business.Please warn our kids of the 30 plus sexually transmitted diseases out there, some with no cure. Please warn our kids of the teenage pregnacy epidemic.Tasha, fake scenes of violence don't ignite our kids sexual passion before they need to be  ignited. To some of us, sex is sacred, not like a handshake you share with everyone.

bambiebarbie123
bambiebarbie123

I actually thought of that one... One out of thousands!!! And still no penetration... It's not whether it's real or unreal it's the intention and result of the cinema itself.

There is no true sex in film and there is so much violence, it seems hypocritical to many :) feel free to have your own opinions...

Marv_Montag
Marv_Montag

I'm of the belief that the general societal view of sex is largely a nonsensical relic from the past that's still held by those who want to think of it as "bad" and something that needs to be "hidden" / "controlled".  I think that it comes from their upbringing, religious beliefs, and / or their own inability to come to terms with their own sexuality in a guilt-free manner.  


It's odd, to say the least, that the assumption is that fantasy can be discerned from reality in terms of shooting, murdering, etc., yet that an identical assumption can't  be made for sex...an obviously far less detrimental (and more natural) human behavior.


We still have a lot of evolving to do in our cultural views.


Rj St Thomas
Rj St Thomas

Because that form of sex is loveless, carnal and an illusion. Sex is a sacred act between a man and woman and this corruption of it is just distasteful to mind, body and soul.

Mitchell_Young
Mitchell_Young topcommenter

There's plenty of simulated sex in movies -- think Monsters Ball for one of many. The sex in mainstream movies is simulated, just like the murder and bloodshed is.

bdsrx8
bdsrx8

It's a question America never seems to answer. Why are people so in love with their guns that not even Sandy Hook can shock them into doing something about violence in this country, but they run to the polls to make sure your industry uses condoms? I guess we can blame our Pilgrim forefathers, but it is all rather silly. It's times like this I miss comedian George Carlin. He pointed out our silliness but fortunately we still have Howard Stern, Jon Stewart and Steven Colbert to pull this country's pants down. Great job Tasha!

GustavoArellano
GustavoArellano moderator editortopcommenter

@fruitcake Also, what's with you and your obsession with using the word "cocksucker"? Ain't getting any, or just telling us about your fantasies?

GustavoArellano
GustavoArellano moderator editortopcommenter

@fruitcake Actually, teenage pregnancy rates have fallen drastically in the past 20 years—but let's not let facts get in the way of your laughable pontification...

Now Trending

Anaheim Concert Tickets

Around The Web

From the Vault

 

Fashion

General

Loading...