[UPDATED with Second Reading Approval:] Lake Forest Scraps Pervs-in-Parks Ban

See the update at the end of this post about the council vote on second reading.

ORIGINAL POST, DEC. 5, 9:39 A.M.: The Lake Forest City Council voted Tuesday night to repeal its ban on registered sex offenders in city parks. These are the same city leaders that last year passed the ordinance establishing Child Safety Zones, which subject registered pervs to fines and/or jail if they fail to get permission from law enforcement before entering designated parks and recreational areas.

The matter is scheduled to come before the council for a second reading on Dec. 18.

District Attorney Tony Rackauckas co-authored the original County of Orange ordinance that several city councils have mirrored at the urging of the DA and other county leaders. The DA reportedly attended Tuesday evening's council meeting to say it would be premature of Lake Forest to scrap its ban. His Chief of Staff Susan Kang Schroeder reportedly informed that Rackauckas and his co-author, county Supervisor Shawn Nelson, expected legal challenges along the way as they did their duty to protect Orange County children.

But T-Rack and Schroeder were not elected to protect the Lake Forest city treasury, members of the City Council were. And they were told by City Manager Bob Dunek that there is no evidence the year-old ordinance has kept sex offenders out of city parks, but there is evidence Child Safety Zones expose the city to mounting court costs, attorney fees and possible damage awards.

When Mayor Kathryn McCullough asked Rackauckas if he would say publicly his office would indemnify Lake Forest for damages, court costs and attorney fees the city might incur by having the ordinance, the DA answered of course not and called her out for a "grandstand question."

Lake Forest, which is home to about 40 registered sex offenders, is among four cities targeted in a federal lawsuit by an unnamed plaintiff who was popped for a sex offense 15 years ago. Now a father, he claims the ordinances violate his 1st, 5th and 14th Amendment rights under the U.S. Constitution. Challenges to similar laws in Orange County have also been filed in state courts.

A panel of Superior Court judges just ruled the Rackauckas-Nelson authored ordinance adopted in April 2011 is unconstitutional. Orange County Public Defender Frank Ospino claims that decision voided the county law. Rackauckas countered the ruling only applied to the specific defendant in the case before the Superior Court judges, who requested the state appeals court intervene for an interpretation on laws banning sex offenders from parks.

Someone claiming to be a registered sex offender told the Weekly Orange County Sheriff's Department officials informed him he can now enter county parks and recreational areas without being subjected to the ordinance sanctions. Sheriff Sandra Hutchens had been among the county officials advocating the enactment of Child Safety Zones before city councils like Lake Forest's.

When the matter returns before the council, there will be two new members to lobby, Adam Nick and Dwight Robinson, who were elected in November.

UPDATE, DEC. 19, 12:30 P.M.: The Lake Forest City Council Tuesday night formally killed its only months old ordinance prohibiting registered sex offenders from entering local parks unless they get the permission from law enforcement.

By a 3-2 vote, the council seconded its Dec. 4 action to scrap the law, arguing that protecting city coffers from lawsuits trumps protecting children from possible harm. Lake Forest is among several Orange County cities being sued on constitutional grounds over ordinances that were approved to mirror the original county version adopted in April 2011.

The dissenting votes came from freshly sworn-in councilmen Adam Nick and Dwight Robinson. Nick explained he surveyed 250 residents, and 82 percent wanted the law retained. Robinson said, as a father, he could not support ditching the Child Safety Zones.

He'll have to convince one more council member to bring it back because, with approval on a second reading, the ordinance is dead for now.

Follow OC Weekly on Twitter @ocweekly or on Facebook!

Sponsor Content

My Voice Nation Help

Who’s children were put at risk? The registrant’s child was by not allowing their first line of protection (their parents) to be there for them. Kids often get hurt in parks. Thank God those children by chance didn’t get hurt during the time these horrible, evil punitive measures were in place! Tony Rackauckas used the registrants as his whipping boy for votes to get re-elected. That is not an uncommon thing for politicians but to do so by putting children at risk is beyond belief and itself should be criminal. I think it is vitally important to define to these leaders what harm is more likely to take place in a park. Has there been any history of registrants harming children in parks? No? But there has been history of children sometimes being hurt in parks whether that be by falling from a tree or choking on a hot dog. A registrant’s child isn’t good enough to be protected by their parent because of their parent’s status. That ladies and gentlemen is wrong at the most basic level. About the sheriff’s waiver program…what about the term Law ENFORCEMENT agency allows them to give registered sex offenders a pass to break the law?It’s remiss of their position to do such a thing. TRUTH


What happens when no children are nabbed?  Shame on the cities of OC for passing laws which do not pass constitutional muster, against the citizens of Lake Forest and Orange County.  How about some laws which actually do something to keep people safe, rather than just inflating the DA's ego and giving people a false sense of security? How about protecting ALL children and EVERYONE's rights?  Hmmmm?


Shameful to not have backbone and only think about the money in possible lawsuits by sex offenders. What happens when 1 of these children are nabbed by one of these offenders? What about those lawsuits? hmmmm? 

The council obviously has their mind made up long before the council meeting, which I think should be said as a disclaimer by someone on council before public comments are made by citizens.


@merijoe Lets break this down.  Out of over 800,000 registered sex offenders (and growing) that are among us if one (just one) messes up it's on National News.   Mined you these people can't get jobs or find housing and even churches treat them differently yet according to the latest Department of Justice Report there's only a 1.9% recidivism rate!  Really?  

That means after their probation, therapy and time served they come out being upstanding citizens.  Shessh... people that is impressive!!!  I wager it is more dangerous to trust the general public than a registered sex offender at least according to the numbers and stats. Oh, the DOJ is no friend to sex offenders.

Ever thought on just how easy it is to become a registered sex offender?  

The real problem is those that are on anti-psychotic drugs the mentally ill.  Those people hear voices and see things

 not there.   Wouldn't you consider them to be the real threat to society?  I think we've missed the real target.  

 Of that 1.9% I wonder how many were mentally ill and just didn't know what they were doing?  A medical registry for the mentally ill I'd understand because it would be of a different nature unlike the online hit-list that is nothing but a form of LIVING DEATH that is Evil, Harmful and Wrong.   TRUTH

Now Trending

Anaheim Concert Tickets

From the Vault