ABC News' 20/20 and Host Chris Cuomo Botched Orange County Internet Dating Horror Story, Lawsuit Claims

Categories: Court, Main, Moxley, TV
Kelley Cahill iCheckmates .jpg
Cahill tells ABC's 20/20 she is an Internet dating victim but solid evidence seems to be missing
A Colorado man accused of "preying" on a "multitude" of Southern California women including Kelley Cahill, the Orange County founder of dating investigative service iCheckmate, has sued Cahill, ABC News' 20/20 and show host Chris Cuomo for libel.

David Williams claims that "Blinded By Love: Kelley Cahill's Ordeal," which broadcast on June 24, 2011, and remains available online at the network, published eight false and defamatory statements "causing great emotional distress."

"[20/20] falsely portrayed Cahill as a victim of an online dating fraud and Williams as the villain, an Internet dating predator who lied to, and took advantage of, women he met online," Alexander Rufus-Isaacs, Williams' Beverly Hills attorney, wrote in the lawsuit filed in Orange County Superior Court.

According to the 11-page complaint, Williams and Cahill met at Match.com in 2005 0r 2006, began dating and bought an OC home together but the affectionate relationship ended when Williams caught her in bed with another man.

"This private matter would have and should have ended there, had Cahill not chosen to use a distorted version of their relationship as a fable on the dangers of Internet dating in order to promote 'iCheckmates,' a business she started which enables users to check the backgrounds of people they meet online," the lawsuit states.

According to Rufus-Isaacs, Cahill approached 20/20 in March 2011--five years after the breakup and then Cuomo and show staffer Jack Pyle produced a story that "falsely stated or implied that Williams lied to Cahill about his marital status, that she had given him gifts including a Range Rover, that he profited from the relationship, whereas she had incurred mounting debts and that he had 'preyed' on a 'multitude of other women.'"

In truth, according to the lawsuit, Cahill was the freeloader in the relationship and Williams told her that he was separated from his wife, not divorced.

Cuomo and ABC sloppily accepted Cahill's assertions as truthful without meaningful, objective research and failed to offer Williams an adequate opportunity to rebut Cahill's allegations, according to the lawsuit.

At this point, I don't know who is telling the truth, but it's clear that Cahill has run a relentless, emotional, public campaign against Williams, who she labels "a cheater."

Cuomo is an outstanding, award-winning journalist, but this particular show was relatively weak. For example, he claims he found a multitude of other women Williams allegedly victimized using the Internet but doesn't show any of them or tell any of their stories. The network also didn't provide viewers with easily available evidence that could have supported or undermined Cahill's claims that she bought him an expensive vehicle and home.

David Williams Kelly Cahill ABC .jpg
Williams and Cahill: Near Fatal Attraction?
And there is this: I would have expected that the network show had found a woman who'd been victimized by a monster or, at least, a veteran criminal or rapist. But, after watching the broadcast, it's obvious that Williams is none of those. The worst that can be said about him is that he cheated on his wife. Yet, ABC didn't nail that point either. If Williams is right and he had separated from his wife at the time of the Cahill relationship, then the story collapses.

In a lame attempt to back Cahill's story of the long-ended relationship, 20/20 showed present-day images of Williams listed negatively on websites such as Cheaters.com and DontDateHimGirl.com. Other than potentially pathetic circular logic, what do those listings prove if Cahill was the person who created them? ABC doesn't get to the bottom of that mystery.

Neither the network nor Cahill has filed a formal response in court to Williams' lawsuit.

The case has been assigned to Superior Court Judge Charles Margines in Santa Ana.

Cahill's business, iCheckmates, offers to do simple background checks on 10 potential dates for $49.95.

No doubt that her business benefited financially by ABC's questionable report.

If the show wants to keep its credibility, it will revisit the situation and, this time, do a thorough job.

(rscottmoxley at ocweekly dot . . . )

Follow OC Weekly on Twitter @ocweekly or on Facebook!

My Voice Nation Help
13 comments
own it
own it

I'm in agreement with Chad. Making an assumption that ABC had not seen significant evidence to substantiate the basis for this segment is foolish. I expect "foolish" to be slapped back into the reality of being held accountable for despicable actions.

Chad
Chad

It is amazing to me that people judge or make stupid comments as quickly as they do.  If ABC did not dig into the story or confirm what they needed to as well as give Williams a chance to share his side of the story, then shame on them.  But for those of you calling Kelley a tramp, Money Hungry and whatever else you are saying, she is a caring, giving and amazing woman that is not out to market her company but to provide a service to others to keep them from being taken as she believes she was.  I personally know Kelley and it is an honor to know someone that thinks more of others then she does of herself and only wants to do what she believes is right.  Before you automatically judge her, do the research that you are saying ABC didn't do otherwise you would be a complete hypocrite!!  

Beeeezzzzlinggg
Beeeezzzzlinggg

Once again, you delete rather than address the issue, Gussie. So let's ask it again: How did you decide that this headline you published -- "Slidebar murders Kelly Thomas" -- wasn't libelous or defamatory? Or should I be asking the Slidebar's attorney that question?

R. Scott Moxley
R. Scott Moxley

Ahhh, honey, ur sad attempt to rattle me actually provided a hearty, post work laugh. Thanks ;) PS again--note that, unlike u, I still can find the courage to attach my real name to my statements.

R. Scott Moxley
R. Scott Moxley

Well, dear, since you want to dish in the comfort of cowardice, okay. I'd rather be a fat blogger than a lying whore. PS--Please note that, unlike you, I am not afraid to attach my name to my stances.

M.
M.

Oh wait.  You're a "blogger", not a journalist.  Hahaha..carry on with your blogging. Blog Blog Blog it on, you big blogger!!  You're fat, aren't you?  Extremely overweight?  Dangerously obese?  I know. 

a healed woman
a healed woman

Wow! Atty is the one that sounds "angry, sexist and bitter" to me, and a tad irrational as well. Your article was delivered with much objectivity and fairness, some people just hate that stuff.

a healed woman
a healed woman

This is a joke! ABC should not be airing defamatory stories without doing proper research and providing proof or items to support the claims. Anyone who cheats is a slime bag, but if (and there appears to be a big "IF") that is all this man is guilty of, then it certainly doesn't warrant condemnation on a national level. Shame on ABC for not doing the necessary investigation for an "investigatory report", how totally unprofessional. I bet the woman has gained much notariety with her claims for her new business... hmmm, sounds like nothing more than very good marketing tactics to me. 

R. Scott Moxley
R. Scott Moxley

News? I love news! Ok, let me read your cowardly message . . . . . . . Well, sock puppet, I understand your pain/anger given your plight. See you in court!

M.
M.

 I have some news for YOU, R. Scott Moxley.  Your writing is putrid.  You wrote: "And there is this: I would have expected that the network show had found a woman who'd been victimized by a monster or, at least, a veteran criminal or rapist."  Victimized by a monster?  Or at LEAST a veteran criminal or rapist?  R. Scott Moxley, rapists and veteran criminals ARE monsters.  You sound like an ignorant, angry, sexist, bitter man.  Not a journalist. You should be fired. I hope this happens soon.

Jack Grimshaw
Jack Grimshaw

Hey,you missed the first letter off your first name ... is it B or C or F or R or T?

Joe
Joe

She sounds like her name would start with an "F"...............

Now Trending

Anaheim Concert Tickets

From the Vault

 

Fashion

Loading...