OC Judge Goes Easy On Female Trainer Who Had Sex With Student

hope_jacoby.jpg

 

Former Tustin High School personal trainer, Hope Ashley Jacoby, 24, was today sentenced to three years of informal probation and 240 hours of community service, after pleading guilty to four counts of unlawful sexual intercourse and three counts of oral copulation with a minor.

Jacoby admitted to having sex with a 16-year-old male student in her car and at her home on several different occasions throughout 2008. 

School officials learned of the relationship when pictures of Jacoby were found on the student's phone.

The prosecution, led by Deputy District Attorney Nikki Buracchio, asked Judge Gregory W. Jones for a more substantial punishment considering the position of trust Jacoby held as a trainer at the school, before handing out the sentence. 

But Judge Jones ruled against the DA's office wishes.

All of Jacoby's offenses are considered felonies, but were reduced to misdemeanors on account of what Judge Jones considered "a totally consensual relationship." Judge Jones described the student as a "willing participant" and "somewhat enthusiastic" about his relationship with the defendant. He also noted that the student "engaged in deception" in an effort to have the relationship continue for as long as it did.


The student was permitted an opportunity to make a victim-impact statement at the hearing today, but did not make an appearance in court. 

Jones also noted that in 34 states, the age of consent is 16. He said the defendant did break the law in California, where the age of consent is 18, but would consider his own behavior to be derelict if he did not take into consideration all factors, including what he called the insignificant age gap, and the ability for 16-year-olds to be tried as adults when they commit felonies in some cases.

The Orange County District Attorney's office has come out with a strong stance against these types of crimes. They believe women and men should receive equal punishment and that Jacoby got off easy.

"Women expect to be treated equally and expect equal rights, and we believe that if you perpetrate the crime, you should do the time," said Susan Kang Schroeder, the public affairs counsel for the DA's office. "Jacoby and her lawyers obviously worked out some kind of deal with the court to have these charges reduced to misdemeanors."

Schroeder said the DA's office has seen cases where the perpetrator is a male in his early twenties and the victim 16 or 17 years of age, and the sentencing is much tougher.

Schroeder, who has advocated her office's position on this issue on Oprah, said her biggest concerns is that parents be able send their children to school without fear of having them corrupted by people in positions of trust.

"This is a case involving a position of trust where the defendant was 23 years old and in a different place in life than [the student], who was 17," Schroeder said. "There is a huge age difference between a 23-year-old and a 17-year-old in the amount of sophistication."

"Everyone on this planet, including Hope Jacoby, knew what she did was illegal," Schroeder said. "The law is the law, and it doesn't matter what the law is in other states or other countries, it is designed to protect minors from these types of situations."

My Voice Nation Help
103 comments
alexandalexa uk kids trainers
alexandalexa uk kids trainers

Read the whole article and these sound very confusing. Well, making such kind of relationship is never been accepted by the any of the people. These thing was never been accepted by any of the female trainee.

Jamesbond_11427
Jamesbond_11427

Before you all go on ranting about unfair the justice system's privilege treatment of female teachers favorable treatment when accused of statutory rape, and how males teachers are unfairly treated, keep this in mind. Only about 21 percent of teacher is male, yet, more male rise to the rank of principal and male teacher earn more on average. Figure this out too, almost 90 percent of reported statutory rape case feature male teachers and female students, yet, these cases never made national headline. In spite of the perception female teachers and male students cases are rare. It just that the media reports them as opposed to the other case.

Tony Colomb
Tony Colomb

Who cares if she had sex with a "minor" or not, I'm sure that if they had intercourse is because they were attracted to each other so it was his responsability too. Live her alone, don't make a big deal out of it, it's not like she would have raped or killed someone.

Sheila
Sheila

Thats hott! Didn't any of you ever have that fantasy in high school of having a sexual relationship with one, if not more, of your teachers? The kid was loving every minute of it, believe me! He probably gets patted on the back each time he walks up and down the hallway! I bet the girls at his school find themselves developing crushes on him!

EDDIE QARTEL
EDDIE QARTEL

MY OPINION ESE IS THAT IF THIS HEINA WAS A BLACK BITCH OR A WETBACK OR A PR LIKE YOURS TRULY EH, SHE WOULD NOT HAVE GONE SO WELL, I THINK BURACCHIO TOOK IT EASY ON THIS HEINA BECAUSE MAYBE RACE COULD HAVE PLAYED AN ISSUE HOMMIE I AM NOT MAD BUT I GOTTA SAY I WOULDVE TAGGED TEAM THIS HEINA IN THE BACK OF MY VAN WITH MY HOMMIE EMILIO IF I HAD THE CHANCE I WISH SHE WOULD TRAIN MY DICK TO STAND ON END HOMMIE!

EDDIE QARTELHARDCOREST NIGGA EVERMYSPACE.COM/EDDIEQ

Michael Ejercito
Michael Ejercito

The Orange County D.A. must appeal this sentence.

The state constitution prohibits gender discrimination (save in explicit exceptions written into the constitution.) The woman is a sex offender, a nithing, and must be punished.

squirrelman
squirrelman

Nice double standard. Think any man would get this light a sentance if the rolls were reversed? The system is a lie.

Billy Bob
Billy Bob

She isn't on the registry yet. I hope she will accept me as a myspace friend!

CHS
CHS

Teacher abused her authority here. I wonder what would happen to me (49-year-old college prof) if I banged one of my late teens-early 20's students on several occasions?

Daniel
Daniel

Wow,wow, wow...poor girl, she can by and suck, tuck, and f_uck my 15yo boy anytime, it doesn't have to be his bday either.

Bear
Bear

FirstWithoutBicycle: You raise very good points.

With respect to angry parents, I sincerely believe there is a psychological aspect to many fathers 'losing' their daughters to another male, or mothers 'losing' their son to another female...If angry parents can capitalize on the 'criminal' justice system for feel good retribution, no doubt they will turn the dogs loose. Even in such cases, people never truly 'feel good.' They may boast of vindication, 'justice being' served, or other Law & Order type colloquialisms, but true freedom can only be achieved by forgiveness and healing, not harboring resentment and bitterness. But, I digress.

Personally, I find no difficulty in determining an appropriate sentence for this case, as I feel there should be no sentence, period. Ms. Jacoby's public humiliation, loss of employment, and doubtless financial losses are in themselves very punitive.

I very much agree that using the term 'rape' in any fashion as related these types of 'crimes' is not only inappropriate, but demeaning to anyone who has be forced to have sex against their will....a true victim.

Much wisdom lies in the phrase: "We should only lock up people we are truly afraid of, not those we are angry at."

Suggested reading: Ain't Nobody's Business If You Do - The Absurdity of Consensual Crimes in Our Free Country, by Peter Mcwilliams.

FishWithoutBicycle
FishWithoutBicycle

"RobE"

Yes...ha ha...women would be drooling, overly-emotional morons without men...very funny...har har har

I'm sure you think me not finding "Obbop"'s comment amusing makes me some kind of shrill, man-hating bitch. What if a WOMAN had posted it and used "Male" instead of "Female"? Would you say she was part of that "female conspiracy"? Do you really think "Obbop" posted it twice for the sake of humor?

FishWithoutBicycle
FishWithoutBicycle

"Bear"

I completely agree with you.

It's difficult to determine the "appropriate" sentence for a crime in which the "victim" in question does not feel they have been victimized. How can we say the punishment is really for the "victim's sake" in that situation? Is it so the rest of us feel better, then? Consider the 18 or 19 year-old man who's 16 or 17 year-old girlfriend's parents want to have him locked up for "statuatory rape" because she had (consensual!) sex with him. Perhaps the parents have the law on their side, but is it really right to prosecute him when their daughter consciously desired to have sex with him? The word "rape" should only be used when a person has actually been forced to have sex against their will! Never for vendetta. And never out of regret.

RobE
RobE

FishWithoutBicycle, Obbop was being satirical. He was snarking against the charge that women are slaves to their emotions.

Get a sense of humor.

RobE
RobE

The judge's decision here was just. I lost my virginity to a 21 year old married woman when I was just short of my 16th birthday. She lived in my neighborhood and made the initial overtures. I think it was because she was lonely (her husband traveled a lot for his job). I enjoyed it and I am sure the *ahem* "victim" in this case did, too.

However, as others have brought up, why is Tustin High hiring personal trainers and this is also a very hypocritical decision because had she been a 24 year old male sleeping with a 16 year old female, he is doing penitentiary time with sex offender registration and a permanent bar from teaching anywhere in the U.S.

What this woman did was exceedingly unprofessional and if there is a license to be a personal trainer in CA (if there isn't, there should be some kind of qualifying regime), she should have it pulled. I also hope she is barred from working for any other school in the state. But that should have been the extent of any punishment for her. This is one of those no harm, no foul situations.

Bear
Bear

If she received the same punishment as a man, that only perpetuates the screwed up system. Her light-handed treatment garners notice, stimulates debate, and establishes a bit of judicial precedent (not that other judges will jump on the bandwagon)...Change has to begin somewhere if it ever stands a chance.

FishWithoutBicycle
FishWithoutBicycle

Jacoby broke the law. She showed extremely poor judgment and should have received the same punishment a man would in a similar situation. (Even if that punishment is unfair). The laws do need to be re-evaluated and, hopefully, changed...then applied evenhandedly to both genders!

---That being said...

This is for "Obbop":Why don't YOU take that misogynist, outdated, pseudo-psychology tripe and shove it where the sun doesn't shine! I am a HUMAN BEING who is entitled to live her OWN LIFE and don't want or need "permission" from a man (or anyone) to do so! From where do you receive this inherent authority over me because I'm a woman? --- I also wonder if you had used the word "Latino" instead of "Female" would it have generated more outrage...apparently it's ok to post outdated garbage about WOMEN on this site...(also read the comments posted by "Stoic" and "Kameron")

P.S. Guys, I don't want to take what's yours�I�m just trying to hold onto what I've got...same as you. :)

obbop
obbop

The best gift for your female is a collar and very firm guidance so the simple typical addle-minded female is not forced to attempt what is either very difficult or impossible for the typical American female... act as an adult in a rough and tumble society that requires an ADULT to accept responsibilities along with attaining rights and privileges.

Guide your female. Do not expect the simpleton to think logically or rationally.

Reward good behavior with the shiny trinkets and baubles the simple creatures crave so much.

This message brought to you by the Females as Property Movement.

CruiserTwelve
CruiserTwelve

fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap fap

BillORiley
BillORiley

Sex is a natural instinct. Leave them alone. Most politicians and government official have affairs and had affairs when they were young. We encourage dating, which leads to sex. Instead of spending our energy to solve problems in our life - education, skill set development, learning to control anger, etc., we waste time in all the natural act. If testorone level is high it is a normal act and people wj\ho talk about morality are basically jealous of those two people and complain. Sex will always win.

OH Baby
OH Baby

OH....uuuuuuuuu...BAY.....YES .....HARDER FASTER....SO THARD.....SO YOUNG.......SO WET..........IN AND OUT,,,,,,..BITE ME,,,,,,,,SUCK ME.......DO IT TO ME,.......i LOVE IT....AH .... AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHH...UUUUUUUUUUUU....OOOOOHHHHH...... I AM GOING TO .........TRUE LOVE

Kameron
Kameron

Ditto what stoic said. In many people's perception, women can do no wrong. And if a women actually does something wrong and it can't be denied and gets caught, people find a way to blame a man for her misdeed.

If it were a 24 year old male teacher with a 16-year-old student, would anyone make excuses for the teacher and give him a lighter sentence because the student was "willing"?

I doubt it.

And what about the equal protection clause in the 14th amendment?

omaha
omaha

The trainer's face is not beautiful at all, uglier than Susan Boyle, (who has a sweet smile, and is changed into a beautiful woman now after given appropriate makeup).Of course the boy didn't love her (unlike Vilii F with his teacher years ago), he only loves the entertainment his trainer gave him.

stoic
stoic

people, we are moving into a pro-female, anti-male society.

be careful...very careful

YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED

bk
bk

If a 16 year old can be tried as an adult in a court of law for premeditated murder, bearing competent testimony throughout trial, and can then serve the same sentence that an adult would, then he is also capable of giving consent to sex.

Rape is not simply immoral sex, which people have every day. Rape is specifically an act of violence, which may include threats or extortion.

No violent act was ever committed by this woman, so this trial is itself a insulting mockery of justice, and the result of the trial is a crime.

Rational
Rational

Good on the kid for making the move. I would have. I also would have kept the pictures in more secure place. Kids these days don't know how to NOT rock the boat.

1 - You hear about these cases more and more because other adults are abusing their power and violating the privacy of teenagers. Spying on phone records, reading emails and IM's, &c.

2. I have to refer to Mary Kay in these cases. She had a relationship with a much younger minor AND went to prison, got the branding, lost everything but what happened once she got out? She married young Billy. Anyone got a male teacher equivalent? It's different because its different.

3. I don't care if female "predators" get off easy. If you can completely separate a young girl from her older authority figure boyfriend and she clearly expresses a healthy desire to maintain the relationship or even end it but still maintain nothing wrong happened then he should get the same. Don't amp up the law in response to this, use it to show there are exceptions to crazy draconian mandatory sentences.

4. I will continue to laugh in the face of anyone who claims women suffer a weaker position in society due to pay discrepency or whatever other BS they cite. Until I hear about a child custody case that respects the father without some huge failing of the mother you are all just hypocrites. Money or opportunity is nothing compared to your children.

tjbro
tjbro

For all you women out there who think all women are as infallible as you are: they're not.

Brian
Brian

Awesome, yet another case of gender discrimination. Had this been a man with a female student he would have went to prison. I say the equal rights movement should have included equal punishment.

Bill Long
Bill Long

Women are weaker, emotionally and physically. Hence the need for special legal protection.

Boggs
Boggs

No one has metnioned the fact the "taking advantage" means using one's predispositions to compromise their position. The boy's hormones being aflame made this woman more powerful than he. It's like every scam in the world. "Oh, you'll pay anything? Step into my office." The fact that the boy wanted it badly only lends to the teacher's condemnation. She should have restrained herself because she was in a position of power. If a 16-year-old girl were obviously sexually confused or motivated, it would be all the more reason for a male teacher to avoid personal contact with her.

There is a place for principle in decision making.

Gustavo Arellano
Gustavo Arellano

Well, nice to know that statutory rapist apologists don't just exist in the Diocese of Orange!

Dan
Dan

Where in the hell were these teachers when I was in school? I would have never missed a class. And for sure on the honor role.

GNUU
GNUU

lets add this up, 16 yr old teen, 24 yr old loose goose. they are both hero's in my book. get over it people.

Laertes
Laertes

What's wrong with a double standard?

A 23-year-old man having sex with a 17-year-old girl is a guy with poor judgment. A 23-year-old girl having sex with a 17-year-old boy is a saint. I wish I'd met someone like her when I was 17.

How about we all quit pretending to be dumber than we are and admit that when you change the genders, you fundamentally change the situation?

Gonzobot
Gonzobot

Ok, so, this post-puberty almost-adult (depending on whether or not he is standing in this spot on the earth, or that one across an invisible line that was made up in the first place) needs to be protected from having consensual sex? 'Scuse me? Since when? If the kid consented, then mayhaps the 'age of consent' is not something that gets to be regulated to the time you have spent on the planet. I've seen 30 year olds that couldn't handle a mature relationship, and 12 year olds that could. California is stupid.

Ed
Ed

Reported by the same paper, on the same day, from 2 towns away, in the same courthouse. How can you not say there is a MAJOR doublestandard?

Teacher gets 240 days in jail for having sex with studentsProsecutors had wanted prison time for Aaron Edwin Westbrook, 26, of IrvineBy RACHANEE SRISAVASDIThe Orange County RegisterComments 34| Recommend 4

A Mission Viejo high school teacher was sentenced today to 240 days in county jail after admitting to having unlawful sexual relationships with two 17-year-old female students, prosecutors said.

Aaron Edwin Westbrook, 26, of Irvine worked at Capistrano Valley High School � where he met the two victims, prosecutors said. He was accused of giving them alcohol and engaging in sex acts at his home, as well the home of one of the victims sometime between June and November 2008.

Today, he pleaded guilty to three felony counts of unlawful sexual intercourse with a minor, two felony counts of oral copulation of a minor, two felony counts of administering a controlled substance to enable a felony, three misdemeanor counts of contributing to the delinquency of a minor, and three misdemeanor counts of furnishing alcohol to a minor.

Superior Court Judge Gregory Jones sentenced Westbrook to the jail term, and three years probation. Prosecutors said they objected to the sentence, and wanted Westbrook to serve prison time.

Westbrook, who also worked as the assistant girls' volleyball and surf team coach, was arrested in December 2008 on while on school grounds. School officials had called police after receiving a concerned parent.

Julie Hatchell, spokeswoman for the Capistrano Unified School District, could not be reached for comment regarding Westbrook's employment status.

Mage
Mage

I would have been beyond enthusiastic when I was 16...

She's HOT, and he's a teenage boy; get over it people.

Alex
Alex

According to NoFanOfJacoby, its ok for a women to rape a 16 year old hormone ravaged teen boy, because it will have no negative effect. A true uninformed liberal remark. Its alos another liberal activest Judge....it doesn't matter if the age of consent is 16 or 18, this women broke the law of trust and took advantage of her student. She is no better then any rapist and should be treated as such.

JamminJenn
JamminJenn

Well you know how I see it, all men(and boys included) are sex hungry! that boy definitely was not raped or taken advantage of or anything like that! He damnwell wanted to get his dick sucked by that teacher and now shes the one dealing with consequences for it. Oh and I'm definitely not saying that the teacher was right either or she got judged "EQUALLY". She must be a pretty hurtin woman to have to sleep with her student. Honestly she is a pretty good lookin woman' and she could definitely do better than a fuckin student unlessssssss..... shes a whore who always wants a dick between her legs! OR sorry in her case her mouth LOL! I understand where all you "guys" are comming from it isn't fair there isn't equal rights! Women are always getting the better end of the deal. Thats like abuse to your partner, if a man hit his woman then he gets charged and most likely goes to jail BUT the woman on the other hand pretty much just gets a slap on the wrist and has to do PROBATION or volunteer work big fuckin woop. Sorry guys but women got it better lol... but I don't think its fair.. us women wanted equal rights..for everything! Not just the good things the bad too! Another thing, age doesn't matter in a relationship as long as both ends agree to it! And guys like the ones who say "giggidy, that boys my hero" or "where were these teachers when I was in school" you are all sick and perverted and thats why women get the better treatment because men love the pussy and women are the ones who have it! Fuckers lmfao

mr perfect
mr perfect

23 and 16 - ehhh, no big deal. That 16 year old boy must have been loving that shit - fantasy come true:)

Anonymous
Anonymous

Kinda wanna high five this kid

cacs
cacs

Living the dream

Timmy
Timmy

If she swallowed I'd have given her a pass!

Bomber3
Bomber3

When I was 16, I spent many an hour fantasizing about my French teacher. If she had agreed to sleep with me...dream come true. No wonder he didn't make a victim impact statement. He loved it, and trust me, no damage was done to him...hmmmmm

IUT
IUT

If a 23 year old man in a position of trust ended up having sex with my 16 year old daughter I'd be out looking for him. If a 23 year old woman in a position of trust ended up having sex with my 16 year old son I'd want her fired and I'd punish my son.

Sorry but it's different. If I looked back at my school days and there was an instance where I had sex with a hot 23 year old teacher, in no way shape or form would I ever feel like I'd been victimized.

It was against the law so she should be punished and she should be fired but "sexual predator"? Come on.

tsinclair
tsinclair

If these people think most 16 year olds aren't sexually active they are fooling themselves.

So what's the difference if the kid is sleeping with another 16 year old or a 23 year old?

From the Vault

 

©2013 OC Weekly, LP, All rights reserved.
Browse Voice Nation
  • Voice Places Orange County

    Voice Places

    Find everything you're looking for in your city

  • Happy Hour App

    Happy Hour App

    Find the best happy hour deals in your city

  • Daily Deals

    Daily Deals

    Get today's exclusive deals at savings of anywhere from 50-90%

  • Best Of

    Best Of...

    Check out the hottest list of places and things to do around your city